Saturday 27 June 2015

What Bobby Jindal must learn from the newest Indian in America



In a country with a teeming population of over a billion people, not every Indian has an opportunity to make it big in the country of his birth. Millions of patriots flock to greener pastures in search of sunrise, and return home to find things still moving at the pace of a bullock cart.

There is hope though. There is always hope as long as the young Indian grazes on perseverance and determination.  One such Indian giant by the name of Satnam Singh Bhamara did exactly that. He made it big - in America - by becoming the first Indian-born basketball player to be picked in the NBA draft (by the Dallas Mavericks).

Unlike Sim Bhullar - who is a Canadian of Indian-origin; Satnam is FBI (Full Blooded Indian). With cows for company, he honed his basketballing talents in the hitherto obscure town of Balloke in Punjab; and now, five years later, he has a one-way ticket to Dallas.

A little more than 170 km away from Balloke lies the town of Khanpura, the ancestral village of a man whose parents who had a one-way ticket to America, and never looked back; a man who's running for the most powerful job in the world - The President of the United States of America.

No prizes for guessing who the subject in question is - Bobby Jindal! The real question is: Who is he?

As Shashi Tharoor puts it, in an immigrant nation of atavists and assimilationists, he is the latter's dream; except that he takes his extreme belief an extra country mile.

In 2008, a 36-year old Bobby (née Piyush) Jindal achieved no mean feat when he became the first US Governor of Indian origin. He had broken the glass ceiling of American politics by occupying the highest office in Louisiana despite the brown colour of his skin.

India too revelled in the victory of their greatest export to the American political arena. But is it to India's credit that Jindal has achieved the success that he has? He doesn't believe so in the least.

Bobby Jindal hates, nay despises any association with all things Indian. The hyphen is his least favourite punctuation mark, the mirror his most disliked object- he loathes being called an Indian-American; he hates the colour of his skin and his Hindu past. He is among the most conservative of the conservative Republican Party, a white interior trapped in a brown exterior.

It is quite alright to not want to be termed a hyphenated-American, but to reject the idea with such indignation and disgust towards the nation of your parents is simply deplorable and disrespectful to anyone with Indian blood running through their veins.
Never mind that he is the antipode of Indianness, or that he doesn't like to acknowledge or celebrate his ancestry, one thing is quite certain: the road is the White House won't be easy. And Bobby Jindal certainly isn't banking on the support of the over 3 million strong Indian-American population to be US President.

But Jindal mustn't forget: Indians may be a divided community; but when they detest someone, their hatred is so fervently profound that it unites them notwithstanding the colour of their passports.  

And remember, when an Indian makes it big in America, the nation rejoices (ask Satnam). An Indian - who never forgets his roots.

Wednesday 3 June 2015

French Open 2015: Nadal's loss and what it means

Gutted. Downtrodden. Run over. Dispirited. Forlorn. Lost.

These are the some of the words to describe how I feel about Novak Djokovic's straight-set pummelling of Rafael Nadal to dethrone the King of Clay.

The Djoker played like the best player in the world (that he is), and come Sunday, if he lifts the Coupe des Mousquetaires, he will have truly deserved it. Even as a Rafa fan, you ought to submit that Nole deserves to sink his teeth into the trophy that has eluded him for so long.

On any other occasion, I would have used the phrase - "Take nothing away from his victory", but tonight, Novak faced a man who looked beaten even before he stepped foot on the red dirt of Phillippe Chatrier. Nadal's demeanour coming into the tournament was jittery, and the nerves were palpable on his face and in his play, as he went down 0-4 in the first set before the heavens smiled, as he levelled the match by taking the next 4.

The hurrah was short-lived. Djokovic has been unplayable and even the 9-time Emperor at Roland Garros had to take his hat off for the World No. 1.

Once the first set was won, one would have expected the Spanish bull to charge forward and reclaim his territory. But somewhere deep in our heart of hearts, we knew that Nadal's time was up: his legendary comebacks - which helped cement his French Empire - were now woefully buried in the annals of tennis history.

His breath sagging, a crestfallen Rafa experienced déjà vu in the third and final set, trailing 0-4 to a Djokovic masterclass. But this time, the match had reach it's point of no return, and Nadal, his nadir.

Djokovic would finally etch his name alongside Robin Soderling as one of only two men to best the King of Clay at the French Open. Last year, and the one before, Nadal barely escaped by the skin of his teeth against Novak. But the writing was on the wall - It was only a matter of time. Defeat was inevitable. He's a mere mortal, after all.

This phenomenal statistic (70-2) defines the French Open, and stands to testimony to the greatness and resolve of two of the greatest players of all time (and a third not so great player).

Where does Nadal go from here? Let's not treat this as the end of Nadal; it's not all gone Pete Tong for Rafa.

It is time for a new beginning, a new game plan, and possibly a new coach (Uncle Toni needs to go). Though 29 isn't exactly the best age to reinvent one's game; Nadal must use this time to introspect, to take corrective action (possibly get married), and to find a way to return to his imperious all-round game; if he is to match or surpass Federer's record 17 slams at all. His unceremonious exit from Roland Garros could be prove to be the defining moment - the loss he so desperately needed. Probably not such a bad birthday gift after all.

The age of Djokovic was never under any serious threat; it is here to stay.  But let's not forget what happened to Soderling in 2009: the curse of the French.